The announcement and preliminary agenda for this meeting were circulated as N370.
The 38th meeting of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 will be hosted by the national body of Germany, in conjunction with the Ada-Europe'2000 conference. The meeting will begin at 9:00 am and is expected to finish by 12:30 pm. The specific meeting room has not yet been determined, but will be in the conference hotel. The conference organizers plan to provide a coffee break during the meeting. I expect an overhead projector to be available. I am also hoping for a computer data projector, but it has not been promised.
Those who are attending the conference should make their hotel reservation on the conference registration form. Those who are not attending the conference should deal with the hotel directly or make alternative arrangements. (Please be aware that other hotels in Potsdam are perhaps 2 to 5 miles away.)
The hotel can be contacted as follows:
Seehotel PotsdamFor conference information, please consult the web site:
http://www.ada-deutschland.de/AE2000/
The meeting will begin at 9:00 am.
{Who?}
has agreed to serve as meeting secretary.
The agenda is shown above.
The minutes of meeting #37 appear in document N367.
[Agenda]
National Body Representatives:
WG9 Officers (if not already listed):
Others:
The BSI Ada panel recently held a meeting. The main purpose was to review the Corrigendum and associated documents. There was general satisfaction with the approach and structure of the documents. It is pleasing to report that new members joined the panel thus indicating a continuing strong UK interest in Ada 95 and its evolution.
Since the last meeting of WG 9 a meeting of the ARG was hosted by DDC-I in March 2000.
[Agenda]
Clyde Roby continues his fine work in maintaining WG9's web page at http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg9/
The Ada Conformity Assessment standard was published 1 December 1999 after successful completion of FDIS balloting by JTC1. The final standard was published less than 12 months after the approval of the new work item by JTC1, less than 15 months after SC22 endorsed the work item and less than 18 months after the need for the standard became apparent. Even these impressive numbers, though, understate the accomplishment--the final text of the standard was available to the Ada community less than 12 months after its need became apparent. We appreciate the continued attention to this document by its editor, Erhard Ploedereder.
The convener is pleased to note that an article about the Conformity Assessment standard was written by Randy Brukardt for the January/February 2000 issue of IEEE Software and that John Barnes has written an article for the Ada Yearbook regarding the process for correcting the Ada standard.
JTC1 approved Technical Report 15942, Guide for the Use of the Ada Programming Language in High Integrity Systems, in October 1999 and the document was published 1 March 2000. We appreciate the attention provided to this project by its editor, Brian Wichmann, and the HRG under the leadership of Alan Burns. Brian had to deal with some particular difficult editing issues in providing a document of this size, with correct indexing, in the required format for publication.
Several nations have ceased active participation in the work of WG9 during recent years. By my count, we are left with five active participants: Canada, Germany, Japan, UK, USA. By the JTC1 directives, active participation by five nations is needed to pursue any new work item. Although this does not endanger the completion of our current work, nor the development of the Technical Corrigendum, it is clear that the prospects for future work, including language revision, is problematic.
Some nations have ceased participation in WG9 because of the expense required to participate in the parent body, SC22. I raised this issue at the recent plenary meeting of SC22. SC22 responded by making a recommendation to JTC1 that "O" (observing) members of SC22 should be permitted to act as "P" (participating) members of individual working groups. In recent balloting, JTC1 approved this proposal. It is my hope that several nations will take advantage of this policy to resume participation in WG9.
A special task force of JTC1 has developed a business plan for making JTC1 standards available in an inexpensive fashion. In recent balloting, JTC1 has approved the report of this task force. The report proposes, in part, a trial period for making standards available on the web for download at a price of $25 US. The results of this ballot was forwarded to ISO Council for consideration during their June meeting. ISO Council approved a trial period for such a policy using the documents of selected subcommittees. Implementation details are forthcoming.
JTC1 has removed all obstacles to the open electronic publication of a Technical Corrigendum to the Ada language standard. JTC1 policy now allows all Technical Corrigenda to be made openly available on the Web.
However, the property rights to publish a Language Reference Manual merged with the corrigendum remain unclear. WG9 has adopted a plan that will permit such publication, but only if the Technical Corrigenda moves through the formal approval process without changes. Therefore, it is essential that all necessary modifications be made prior to the formal submission of the document by the United States National Body. The convener requests the continuing attention of the national bodies to this concern.
The three-year term of the convener expires at the September 2000 plenary of SC22. At this time, the convener plans to offer to continue for another three-year term.
[Agenda]
The schedule for meetings #39 and #40 is proposed:
[Agenda]
This is the "To Do" list for WG9. Some are informal action items assigned to various participants. Some are formal resolutions which are not yet implemented. Some are suspense items awaiting action by other groups.
(None)
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 recommends to SC22 that the following standards be withdrawn when they reach the end of their five-year life. Both standards are relevant to the 1987 version of the Ada language standard rather than the current version.
Status: OPEN. This resolution has been reported to SC22 and endorsed at their plenary meeting in August 1998. The SC22 Secretariat advises that routine processing by ISO Central Secretariat should result in withdrawing the standards before the end of 2000.
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 recommends to SC22 that the following standard be withdrawn when it reaches the end of its five-year life. The standard is relevant to the 1987 version of the Ada language standard rather than the current version:
Status: OPEN. This resolution has been reported to SC22 and endorsed (Resolution 99-19) at their plenary meeting in September 1999. The SC22 Secretariat advises that routine processing by ISO Central Secretariat should result in withdrawing the standards before the end of 2001.
WG9 resolves that the layout of the planned Technical Corrigendum to ISO/IEC 8652 will contain the specific wording changes to the standard on a sub-clause by sub-clause basis, cross-referenced to an accompanying Defect Report [Disposition] document. The latter will be a compendium of the respective AIs, basically in the style that was used for publishing the AIs in Ada Letters during 1998.
Status: OPEN. Normal processing of the Corrigendum is expected to implement this resolution.
WG9 adopts the following timetable for the production of the Technical Corrigendum to ISO/IEC 8652:
with status to be reported at WG9 meetings.
Status: OPEN. Normal processing of the Corrigendum is expected to implement this resolution.
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 accepts the offer of the US National Body to be responsible for the preparation of Defect Reports, Defect Report Responses, a Technical Corrigendum and related supplementary material for ISO/IEC 8652. The terms of reference for producing the documents are: (1) The scope of the effort shall be limited to AIs approved by WG9; (2) The US shall invite review and comments from WG9 participants, the project editors of ISO/IEC 8652, and other concerned parties; (3) Preliminary results shall be shared with WG9 participants by May 15, 2000; and (4) Final results shall be contributed to WG9 by August 15, 2000.
Status: OPEN.
[Agenda]
[Agenda]
From Convener's Report, 1 July 1998, N345:
Project 22.10.02 -- IS 11430:1994 Generic Package of Elementary Functions
for Ada, Ken Dritz, editor
Project 22.10.03 -- IS 11729:1994 Generic Package of Primitive Functions for
Ada, Ken Dritz, editor
The contents of 11430 and 11729 are substantively subsumed by the subsequent
approval of the 1995 revision of 8652. WG9 has requested that these standards
be withdrawn at the conclusion of their five-year review period.
From Plenary Meeting Report of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22, 24-28 August 1998, N351:
Resolution 98-Q: Standards for Periodic Review -- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 ... recommends that the following standards be withdrawn:
From Convener's Report, 28 June 1999, N364:
Withdrawal of this standard [11430 and 11729] was approved by the 1998 SC22 plenary.
From Ken Dritz, 14 March 2000:
For 11430 and 11729, nothing to report.
[Agenda]
From Convener's Report, 1 July 1998, N345:
Project 22.35 -- (Type 2) TR 11735:1996 EXTensions for real-time Ada,
Nasser Kettani, Editor
The contents of 11735 are substantively subsumed by the 1995 revision of 8652.
This Technical Report will be withdrawn when usage of the 1987 version of the
Ada language has diminished.
From Convener:
Because TR 11735 was completed in 1996, its five-year review date falls in the year 2001. At its September 2000 plenary, SC22 will take a position on the future of this TR. Therefore, at this meeting, we must make a recommendation. We have three choices: confirm, revise, withdraw. I have drafted a recommendation to withdraw on the grounds that the TR is based upon the 1987 version of the language.
[Agenda]
Project 22.31 -- IS 12227:1995 SQL/Ada Module Description Language (SAMeDL), Andreas Koeller, editor.
Resolution 36-3, N363:
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 recommends to SC22 that the following standard be
withdrawn when it reaches the end of its five-year life. The standard is
relevant to the 1987 version of the Ada language standard rather than the
current version:
Resolution 99-19, SC22 N3013:
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22 recommends that the following standard be withdrawn:
[Agenda]
Project 22.10.04 -- IS 13813:1998 Generic packages of real and complex type declarations and basic operations for Ada (including vector and matrix types), Don Sando and Ken Dritz, editors
There has been no activity with respect to ISO/IEC 13813 since the last WG9 meeting.
[Agenda]
Project 22.10.05 -- IS 13814:1998 Generic package of complex elementary functions for Ada, Jon Squire and Ken Dritz, editors
[Agenda]
ISO/IEC 8652:1995 Information Technology--Programming Languages--Ada
Project 22.10.01, Randy Brukardt and Erhard Ploedereder, Project Editors
The ARG met in Phoenix, USA on March 29-31, 2000. At the meeting the Technical Corrigendum for the Annexes was carefully reviewed as well as the changes to the Technical Corrigendum for the Core language (which had been reviewed at the Sept'99 meeting). At this point, a small number of Defect Reports are still not completely settled. They are on the agenda for the ARG meeting that commences after the WG9 meeting in Potsdam. Hopefully they will be resolved (or else they will be dropped from the Corrigendum). Also, an editorial review of all the documents (Defect Reports, Technical Corrigendum, Record of Responses) is currently underway.
[Agenda]
Resolution 36-4, N363:
In the judgment of WG9, the interests of the Ada community are best served
by developing a Technical Corrigendum document rather than by revising the
standard
Resolution 36-5, N363:
WG9 resolves that the layout of the planned Technical Corrigendum to
ISO/IEC 8652 will contain the specific wording changes to the standard on a
section by section basis, cross-referenced to an accompanying Defect Reports
document. The latter will be a compendium of the respective AIs, basically in
the style that was used for publishing the AIs in Ada Letters during 1998.
Resolution 36-6, N363:
WG9 adopts the following timetable for the production of the Technical
Corrigendum to ISO/IEC 8652:
From SC22 Secretariat, 27 April 1999 [regarding procedures for
progressing the CORR]:
You don't need an NP and, unless you are changing project editors, you don't
need [any] other blessing from SC22 or JTC 1. Having notified me and assuming
that the project editors for the Technical Corrigendum will be the same as for
the revised 8652 (i.e., Ploedereder and Brukardt), WG9 can proceed to develop
it. If you are changing project editors, SC22 will have to approve the new
one(s). Otherwise, there is nothing here [that] requires SC22 approval until
the Technical Corrigendum is ready for ballot. It will be developed as part of
Project JTC 1.22.10.01.
Resolution 37-7, N367:
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 accepts the offer of the US National Body to be
responsible for the preparation of Defect Reports, Defect Report Responses, a
Technical Corrigendum and related supplementary material for ISO/IEC 8652. The
terms of reference for producing the documents are: (1) The scope of the
effort shall be limited to AIs approved by WG9; (2) The US shall invite review
and comments from WG9 participants, the project editors of ISO/IEC 8652, and
other concerned parties; (3) Preliminary results shall be shared with WG9
participants by May 15, 2000; and (4) Final results shall be contributed to
WG9 by August 15, 2000.
From Minutes of Meeting #37, N367:
By its March 2000 meeting, the ARG should complete its review of the Technical Corrigendum by considering the issues related to the annexes. However, it is probable that there will still be outstanding Ada Issues that will not be resolved for incorporation into the TC. It is therefore possible that there may be a second TC in the future. Furthermore, some issues may not be suitable for resolution by a TC. For example, an extension of the language such as "with type" might have to be performed by Amendment or Revision rather than a TC.
The actual preparation of the TC and related material will be performed under a contract to The MITRE Corporation. MITRE will contract for the documents on a "work for hire" basis and will copyright the results. The copyright notice will provide appropriate permissions to ensure that the documents can be widely distributed. The completed documents will be turned over to the USNB for contribution to WG9. The USNB will ensure that review occurs during document preparation so that the completed documents are ready for approval by WG9 and SC22.
The Defect Reports and the TC will include a discussion of "paragraph numbers" so that users of the standard will know to simply count the paragraphs within the subclauses.
From Convener:
Because the Fall 2000 meeting of WG9 will be conducted in November, the
convener plans to achieve formal WG9 approval of the Technical Corrigendum via
a 30-day email ballot immediately following its contribution by the United
States National Body. The Convener presumes that the document will be approved
by WG9 without substantive comment so that it may be forwarded immediately to
SC22 for approval.
The draft Corrigendum is in a nearly final form. (A copy of it was distributed by Jim Moore prior to the meeting, and also is available on the ACAA web site at www.ada-auth.org/~acats/grab-bag.html). The ARG will meet immediately after the WG9 meeting to work out the remaining technical issues.
There is also an associated set of Defect Reports (containing additional information on each issue). Finally, there is a Record of Response document (required by SC22), which gives the answers to issues that do not require wording changes, yet still are not necessarily obvious from the standard. The ARG is currently reviewing these documents.
The intention is that ARG will approve final drafts of all of these documents at the following meeting. The documents will then be submitted to WG9 to initiate the processing of the Corrigendum and related documents by WG9 and SC22.
As part of this work, a tool has been developed to generate the Ada Reference Manual (and the AARM as well) in the modern RTF and HTML formats. The RTF format is intended to be used with Word 97 to create printable versions of the documents, while the HTML version provides a hyper-linked version of the documents.
The tool works on source input which is a lightly modified version of the original Intermetrics Scribe input files. The tool supports almost all of the capabilities of the original processor (including automatic numbering of clauses and paragraphs, and automatic generation of Annexes K [attributes], L [pragmas], M [implementation-defined characteristics], N [glossary], P [syntax summary], and the Index.
These documents provide us with several needed capabilities:
We intend to produce a RM including all of the Corrigendum changes for free distribution in RTF and HTML formats soon after WG9 approval of the Corrigendum. This will help by making the Corrigendum changes widely and freely available, especially to users and Ada vendors.
ISO/IEC 18009:1999, Information Technology -- Programming Languages -- Ada:
Conformity Assessment of a Language Processor
Project 22.18009, Erhard Ploedereder, Project Editor
From Convener:
Standard was published 1 December 1999.
[Agenda]
ISO/IEC 15291: 1999, Information Technology--Programming Languages--Ada
Semantic Interface Specification (ASIS)
Project 22.15291, Clyde Roby and Steve Blake, editors
(To be provided at the WG9 meeting.)
[Agenda]
ISO/IEC TR 15942:2000, Guidance for the use of the Ada Programming Language
in High Integrity Systems
Project 22.15942 Brian Wichmann, Editor
From SC22 Programme of Work, Updated 30 September 1999: DTR 15942 has been submitted for JTC1 Letter Ballot ending 19 October 1999.
From ISO Central Secretariat: ISO/IEC TR 15942 was published 1 March 2000.
The HRG has produce a draft work item on Ravenscar, it has a meeting planned in September where the aim is to agree this work item.
[Agenda]
REPORT OF LIAISON FROM WG9 TO IEEE PASC AND WG15
In the arena of POSIX Ada bindings, the combined POSIX.5,.5b, and .5c standard is moving ponderously toward ISO/IEC JTC1 fast-track ballot. The issue at present is what should be the title of the ISO standard. The IEEE has treated each increment to POSIX.5 (i.e., POSIX.5b and POSIX.5c) as an amendment, but they are all published as a single document. In contrast, the ISO ballot will be for a REVISION that replaces the current ISO/IEC 14519 by the entire new document. The title needs adjustment to reflect this.
Please urge your national representatives to vote "yes" when the ballot appears.
Since the POSIX.5c standard was approved by IEEE, there are only two active IEEE PASC projects that include Ada bindings, namely:
Both of these groups are still at work developing drafts. They are moving very slowly, and the drafts are not yet gotten ready for ballot.
The latter project is associated with the SAE Avionics Operating Systems working group and includes bindings for some of the functionality of POSIX.1d and POSIX.1g, but there is no project to develop full Ada bindings for the POSIX.1d and POSIX.1j standards.
Outside of the Ada bindings area, the big project is 1003.1g Alignment with the Single Unix Specification. The three POSIX and Unix standards groups, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG15, IEEE PASC, and The Open Group, are jointly working on a unified UNIX/POSIX standard, covering the C-language API, shell, and utilities. The WG15 and IEEE POSIX standards projects were already unified, so the big change here is bringing them together into a single working group with The Open Group. The joint working group is called the "Austin Group", after the location of their inaugural meeting.
Lots of information about this project is available on line, including the Draft 3 document (see "http://www.opengroup.org/austin/").
I have been monitoring the work by e-mail, and it appears to be moving ahead quite well. Within the snowstorm of e-mail, I noticed the following few classes of issues that may server to give a flavor of the activity. There were differences in terminology, including the uses of imperatives "must", "shall", "may", etc. between the standards of The Open Group and POSIX, which need to be resolved. The Austin Group draft standard is bringing in the POSIX.1g (Sockets and XTI) standard. This is causing some debate over details, since The Open Group's corresponding standard differs from POSIX.1g. The incorporation of POSIX.1d (Additional Realtime Extensions) and POSIX.1j (Advanced Realtime Extensions) is also causing some debate over details.
I had originally hoped that this process might provide a vehicle for getting some small changes to the POSIX threads standard that would make it more compatible with Ada tasking. That sort of change is out of scope. The scope of the project is limited to merging existing standards, plus the incorporation of standing Interpretations.
There is no corresponding activity on the Ada API standards, because there is no corresponding standard of The Open Group.
--Ted Baker WG15 Liaison to WG9 WG9 Liaison to WG15 and PASC WG15 US TAG Liaison to WG9 US TAG[Agenda]
No unfinished business is expected.
[Agenda]
No new business is expected.
[Agenda]
According to JTC1 Directives, Rapporteur Groups serve from meeting to meeting of the parent body. The following resolution continues the existing RGs with their existing Chairs until the next meeting of WG9.
We appreciate the comfortable accommodations provided Ada-Europe and by the German National Body. The following resolution expresses WG's gratitude.
[Agenda]
Resolutions are numbered provisionally and will be renumbered when the minutes are prepared.
The minutes of Meeting #37 as contained in document N367 are approved.
[Discussion] [Agenda]
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 continues the following Rapporteur Groups until the next plenary meeting and expresses its grateful appreciation to their chairs for their continuing service:
[Discussion] [Agenda]
Noting the publication of ISO/IEC 18009, WG9 congratulates its editor, Erhard Ploedereder.
[Discussion] [Agenda]
WG9 expresses its gratitude to Ada-Europe and to the National Body of the Germany for their gracious accommodations in hosting Meeting #37.
[Discussion] [Agenda]
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 expresses its grateful appreciation to {who?} for serving as secretary of Meeting #38.
[Discussion] [Agenda]
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 expresses its grateful appreciation to Clyde Roby for maintaining the WG9 Web Page.
[Discussion] [Agenda]
Having examined the draft of the planned United States National Body (USNB) contribution for 8652:1995/CORR, WG9 determines that the substantive content of the draft is a satisfactory basis for for the text of the CORR. WG9 requests that the USNB resolve remaining editorial issues and effect contribution of the document by 15 August 2000. The Convener is directed to commence a 30-day email ballot for approval of the CORR immediately upon receipt of the contribution from the USNB. Upon approval by WG9, the convener is directed to submit the CORR for approval by ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22.
[Discussion] [Agenda]
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 expresses its congratulations and its appreciation to Randy Brukardt for the preparation of the article on ISO/IEC 18009 appearing in the January/February 2000 issue of IEEE Software.
[Discussion] [Agenda]
Noting the publication of ISO/IEC Technical Report 15942, WG9 congratulates its editor, Brian Wichmann.
[Discussion] [Agenda]
WG9 schedules future meetings as follows:
[Discussion] [Agenda]
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9 recommends to SC22 that the following Technical Report be withdrawn when it reaches the end of its five-year review period. The Technical Report is relevant to the 1987 version of the Ada language standard rather than the current version:
[Discussion] [Agenda]
Adjournment is planned for approximately 1:00 pm.
[Agenda]
[Agenda]
[Agenda]
End of Document